Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Technological Literacy in Small Schools V. Large Schools


            As a student from a very small town, I arrived at Michigan Tech and immediately felt intimidated by the technology that surrounds us here; from Mac computer systems to SmartBoards, to MatLab, I had no idea how to operate a great deal of it. I was forced to learn as I went, asking questions often and relying on others’ advice; I was fortunate in finding a job at the J.R. Van Pelt and Opie Library where I was given hands-on training and valuable work experience. However, not all are given the same opportunities I was, or are as readily able to ask questions. It is these students who find themselves falling behind their peers in all aspects of their education, as Michigan Tech demands its students use technology in nearly all aspects of their educations. The majority of students from small school districts with significantly less money to appropriate to technology arrive at Michigan Tech at a disadvantage to those with more technological experience.
                Graduating with a class of 91 students, I can very easily relate to this topic. I attended Manistique High School for four years, and experienced a variety of budget cuts during my time there; loss of revenue was one of many effects of the economical downfall our nation experienced. I first researched the 2010-11 budget for Manistique Area Schools, and found that approximately $49,000 was appropriated to “high school supplies,” which I assume includes technology such as new computers and software. During that fiscal school year $11,000 was cut from the same supplies budget, meaning over 20% of the money for computers and other necessary supplies was needed elsewhere. As a result, students go another year without new technology in school, and fall further behind in their technological educations. On the opposite end of the spectrum is Livonia Public Schools; though this district consists of several different schools, including 6 high schools, it still had a comparatively massive technology equipment fund of $1,000,000 during the 2010-11 school year. Stevenson High, one of Livonia’s high schools, has pages on its website dedicated to the many educational programs it offers as well as a link specifically directed toward “academically gifted students.” It can be assumed that this school focuses on giving its students only the most advanced technology in order to be competitive with other schools in the state as well as across the country, thus giving them the opportunity to become more technologically fluent.
                Fluency in technology, as described by Kate Williams, is having “contemporary skills, foundational concepts, and intellectual capabilities.” In other words, one must be reasonable, able to problem solve, have knowledge of computers and their systems, and be able to use basic computer functions and programs. Growing up asdigital natives,” today’s students automatically have some of these requirements, as they are exposed to technology from birth, and receive some form of formal education on the subject regardless of what public school they may attend. As stated in the article by Kate Williams, “there is a literacy divide between school and home.” This statement is entirely true, as many students do have access to technology at home, on which they can learn a great deal more than is offered in school. Unfortunately, not all students have any access to computers or internet, and therefore are restricted to what their school can offer. Thus, the rate at which students learn to use new technology as well as their comfort with technology depends heavily on the amount of money their school districts invest in new technology, as well as how often these systems are updated. As Samantha Blackmon states, students who are unfamiliar with technology and who lack competency, comfort, and confidence in their abilities are more likely to shy away from learning to use new technology. Though Blackmon’s piece is in reference to minority high school students, the same idea applies here. Students who come from school districts with less money for technological advances will come into college with less experience and potentially a fear of learning to operate new technology, or to ask questions about it. Speaking from my own experiences, I was extremely intimidated by some of the programs we were expected to use in my first semester here.
                Speaking with fellow classmates as well as an employee for MTU’s IT services, it was fairly easy to conclude I was not the only freshman to feel this intimidation during my first semester. During my struggles I banded together with others whose schools hadn’t offered them the technological head start we saw many of our classmates had been given. It was easy to relate to others whose schools had offered only basic knowledge of computers and their programs; we were the ones spending endless hours in the learning centers struggling over what many considered basic concepts. Chris, an IT employee, stated that he has dealt with many freshmen who have no idea where to begin when it comes to dealing with the technology we use here at Tech. Though he couldn’t be sure where each student was from and how much they had been exposed to technology at their respective schools, he did say that he’d often encountered students with issues that had simple solutions to someone with his experience. One potential solution to this common occurrence may be to offer a course educating students in some of the more advanced technology offered by Michigan Tech. Similar to “Creating Your Success,” this course would be optional to incoming freshmen who may feel that they need an introduction to those programs that are unfamiliar to them. The university could even require a placement test for all first year students, similar to the spatial visualization test given during orientation week, which would determine which students absolutely needed to course to be successful. I feel that there are many opportunities to even the playing field when it comes to technology, and Michigan Tech should make the effort to give all incoming students an equal opportunity to succeed. Regardless of where students come from or what their technological literacy is upon arriving here, they all deserve the opportunity to be a successful Husky.

No comments:

Post a Comment